There are now, what, six different articles about femcels floating around different media websites? This is a message to anyone who found their way to thepinkpill through those articles.
What the articles don't stress is that objective beauty absolutely exists, and so does objective ugliness.
Femcels are defined by ugliness. Real ugliness. It's not in our heads. We don't have BDD. We are just ugly and unattractive. Being an ugly and unattractive woman doesn't make you a bad person though. Yet society collectively likes to think so.
Certain aspects of the femcel experience (social shunning, loneliness, bullying, lookism etc.) are relatable, but just because you have experienced them at times does not automatically make you a femcel.
To repeat: femcels are women who are objectively ugly. "Ugly" is often used as an insult towards women, but here we use it as an objective truth. Femcels will have extreme difficulty getting a serious boyfriend/girlfriend and the vast majority will never marry due to their looks. If you were able to get a boyfriend in the past/present and have had men ask you out, you are not a femcel. You are most likely a normie or low tier normie. The only time I was asked out by a boy was in middle school as a joke. He couldn't even finish asking me because he was laughing so hard.
Study after study has shown that Beauty is NOT in the eye of the beholder. Even six month old human infants can differenate between "ugly" faces and "beautiful" faces. No one is teaching these infants that beautiful faces are more interesting or nicer. Six month old babies don't even understand language or have control of their bodily functions yet they can tell when someone is hot or not. The infants are instinctively more interested in the beautiful faces and less interested in the ugly faces. Beauty is an instinct.
Beauty also transcends race. Beautiful women and handsome men look similar to other beautiful women and handsome men of other races. This is because all humans find certain traits attractive no matter what race someone is. Examples are: positive canthal tilt, symmetrical face, wide palate smile, straight nose bridge, etc. If you look at a group of beautiful women from different races they will look like multi-racial cousins. Their facial proportions will be the same, even if the particular features are different. Seriously, it looks like they all had the same grandmother or something.
To measure beauty we often use the 1 to 10 scale, with 1 being extremely ugly and 10 being extremely beautiful. The 1 to 10 scale is NOT like a school assignment where you need at least a 7/10 to get a normal grade. Most people you will see on a daily basis are 5/10. This is because looks are distributed along a bell curve like this: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xJ0ppilYqPc/UWL97BNIc0I/AAAAAAAAAVs/L_EewLX9lW8/s1600/hs.png
A score of 5/10 is a normal score.
However femcels are women who are 3/10 and below. Femcels will recieve harassment from men and women alike, and even the occasional child. Plastic surgery (aka "hardmaxxing") is needed to improve a femcel's looks. Makeup, skincare, fashion, and hair are NOT enough.
Men admit in private that they are unable to maintain an erection for women they consider 3/10 and below. This is why incels do not want to date femcels. They are not physiologically aroused by us. Even if they still attempt to have sex with us, they will be imagining a different woman in their head. This is where many "paper bag" jokes come from. See: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=paper%20bagging
Femcels are also not "butterfaces." In addition to having unattractive faces, we have unattractive bodies as well. "Butterfaces" will generally qualify as a type of low tier normie/regular normie.
Women who are considered 4/10 (aka "low tier normies") will have overlapping experiences with femcels. However low tier normies will be able to "softmaxx" using hair, makeup, skincare, and fashion to live a normalish life and gain a normalish boyfriend/husband/girlfriend/wife. Visit 
+PinkPilledNormies for additional discussion.
Please note: Using the 1 to 10 scale to rate yourself is NOT sexist! Men are just as easy to rate on the 1 to 10 scale like women. The 1 to 10 scale is the best way to convey your attractiveness without revealing your face online. Revealing your face online leaves you susceptible to doxxing and extreme harassment. No scale is going to be a perfect objective measure of beauty, but they are usually only 1-2 points off at their worst.
Example of the 1 to 10 scale for women:
Examples of the 1 to 10 scale for men:
Feel free to disagree with me, but please recognize that there are features that are objectively beautiful and there are features that are objectively ugly for both men and women.
Trying to gaslight an ugly women into believing she's normal or even beautiful is cruel when so much of a woman's life depends on how attractive she is. Recognizing we are ugly is not sexist. I think it's more sexist to demand that every woman on earth think of herself as beautiful despite all evidence to the contrary.
+TruFemcels
Jump in the discussion.
Become a member of +TruFemcels, no email address required. Take ThePinkPill.
Thank you 馃挏 I really appreciate it, and I'm glad that I count - I know I'm not in exactly the same situation as many of you, but I feel so hard what so many of you say - just for slightly different reasons. Men really are awful
More options